|
|
Having experienced the banning of some of my columns  from
some so-called conservative Web sites, I wasn't surprised to read that
Steve Sailer, whose columns appear on the VDARE
Web site had the same thing happen to him with a fairly innocuous
column he wrote entitled "GOP
Future Depends on... White Vote" that was apparently not
allowed to be posted on that bastion of free speech (sure it is), the
FREE REPUBLIC. "White vote?" "W-H-I-T-E?! The 'W' word? You can't say that!" According to his subsequent report on the banning, carried on VDARE, Sailer wrote that Jim Robinson, the owner of Free Republic, said the article was banned for "promoting racism" and because it was "divisive." Well, of course it did, and of course it was; it used the "W" word. Hmmmm. Well, read the column for yourself. But, unless you're a loony liberal or one of those Pimple Rightists who's afraid to even order white paint at the local hardware store lest someone take offense and think you're a racist, you'll be hard pressed to see why Sailer's column was banned. |
As I mentioned at the outset, I've experienced a similar
banning. One "conservative" Web site, that brags about being bold (no
kidding), banned my columns (all of them, I think). The guy who owns this
Web site also insisted on calling me "Dude" a couple of times in his emails
to me (Like, groovy. He's hip, you see) and did an email version of a
whisper about "us" not mentioning race or some such twaddle. "Us"? Did
he mean conservatives or did he mean whites. I think he meant conservative
whites, with a strong emphasis on the white part.  Call
it what it is: A perverse form of noblesse oblige feeling of racial superiority
that holds that whites must be aracial and not notice race unless they're
praising non-whites for being better at something than whites. "After
all, daaaaaahling, THOSE PEOPLE do need encouragement and proof that we
really, really do like them, despite that, oh, you know, birth defect
of non-white skin, which of course we must pretend that we never notice,
just as we pretend we don't notice when someone is missing a nose or an
eye. Oh, do pass the caviar." Then, another "conservative" Web site ran some of my columns. However, my columns suddenly did a Lenin and disappeared from the site, never to be seen again. I never bothered to ask why, because the site is too damn slow loading anyway and it mostly runs the same old patellar reaction  Clinton
bashing crap.If I were to offer a wild guess as to why my stuff was pulled, I would say that they probably got a complaint from another of their "writers" who writes the most banal drivel about Ayn Rand and about why "we" (oh, not "we" exactly, just you and me) should die for Israel, even though "we" aren't Jewish (oh, not "we" exactly, just you and me). |
|
Now, I don't know this for a fact, but I suspect that
a bunch of the people running some of these "conservative" sites are
grown up (sort of) mentally constipated, sexually repressed now aging
|
Young
Republican types who couldn't get dates, or who didn't want to go out
with girls while in college, so they spent their weekends hanging around
their dorms or the College Union wearing cheap, poor fitting Young Republican
suits with too tight neck ties and toe pinching shoes, muttering to
themselves about the evil liberals. 
Or,
maybe you've seen them sitting at Bill Buckley's feet with their eyes
glistening all the while they smile that Ward and June Cleaver knowing
smarmy smile at each other when Buckley uses a word with more than one
syllable, and bests those evil liberals. These guys are usually carrying
signs with messages that are right out of the Saturday Evening Post.
The messages on the signs are always PC, because this afraid of their
own shadow crowd, is constantly running away from being called "racists"
and always trying to prove that some of their best friends are black
or Hispanic or Asian, or whatever. These "conservatives," unfortunately, represent all
conservatives in many people's eyes. Is it any wonder that so many people
don't like conservatives? These "conservatives" are inauthentic. They
are lifeless. They're afraid to scream out at an uncaring universe: I
EXIST. I WILL THINK MY THOUGHTS AND I WILL EXPRESS THOSE THOUGHTS, AND
IF SOMEONE DOESN'T LIKE MY THOUGHTS, SCREW THEM! Instead, these "conservatives"--these
Pimple Rightists-- sit over in the corner mewling about this or that arcane
 libertarian
writer or philosopher. As you may have guessed, I have about as much use for the Pimple Right, as I do for liberals. The Pimple Rightists remind me of rabbits starting at the slightest sound. I say, screw them. Now, speaking of columns that get the Pimple Right running for cover, did you see the one I wrote about slimy brown goop? That's the one that Alan Dershowitz used at President Clinton's impeachment hearings in an attempt to smear Congressman Bob Barr and Senator Trent Lott, because these guys had once spoken before the C OF CC, a group that has been fearless in publishing my columns--not necessarily because the group necessarily agrees with them, but because they believe in (are you ready?) F R E E S P E E C H! Even for white people. How racist of them. |
 It
turns out that Dershowitz, who had complained on national TV that at least
one of my columns, as mentioned above, was racist, apparently because
it, and many others, by the way, often deal with white identity issues
and the assimilation of whites into the Earth's 90% nonwhite human population,
had previously written a book,"The Vanishing American Jew: In Search of
Jewish Identity for the Next Century" which essentially said the same
thing about Jews that my column had said about non-Jewish whites. Oh,
he had used more circumspect language, and he tried to skirt the issue
of whether a Jewish identity involves genes (it does, at least in its
purest form, because of the Orthodox requirement that a Jew be born of
a Jewish mother) but, even with his fudging and trying to make the case
that a Jewish identity doesn't involve genes (because, that would be,
oh, you know," racist," of course) but, instead, involves reading Jewish
books, he still wondered if his grandchildren by his son who had married
an Irish Catholic girl would be Jewish or not.  I
suggested in a subsequent column that if Dershowitz was worried about
his grand kids not being Jewish he could just give them some Jewish books.
Now they're Jewish. End of problem. Now, I have to add that Dershowitz
always reminds me of Woody Allen, who I did a movie with once, because
these guys look a lot alike. I guess they must have read the same books.
|
| Being banned isn't so bad. There are many Web sites
starting up all the time, and with a little luck, there'll be writers
and Web masters who will refuse to conform to what the PC tyrants--which
includes many Pimple Rightists--think is acceptable. Free minds and free
speech are the issues, and as I've written elsewhere, in the end it matters
little whether free minds and free speech are being suppressed by government
jackbooted thugs or by private jackbooted thugs. Which is not to say that
those who own Web sites which do censor material are necessarily jack
booted thugs. After all, they should make decisions on what to run based
on their own criteria. They have free speech rights also. However, those
who are pushing for genuine free speech rights realize that the "seven
filthy words" you can't say aren't words about sex and bodily functions
anymore; they're now about anything that might state or infer that the
races of man are different from each other in any way other than skin
color, and anything that offends Jewish sensibilities. For more on the
harm caused--including the death of black babies-- by the belief that
there are no racial differences, take a gander at my column: "Black Medicine,
White Medicine," floating around in cyberspace someplace. |
But, all of this just begs the question which led to
the banning of Sailer's column and some of mine as well: What is racism?
To me, that term just means that one understands the reality of nature
that "race" is to humans as "breed" is to canines. It does not mean "racial
hatred" which is a different concept entirely even though the serial name
callers among us, who want to smear others, will use the term "racism"
to mean "racial hatred" in one sentence and to mean something else in
another, as they constantly shift terms in order to keep people brow beaten
and in  an
intellectual prison ringed all about with razor words that those so imprisoned
dare not pass. This reduces humans to the level of cattle, whose real
prison is in their minds and not the flimsy strands of wire that psychologically
keep them in the pen, waiting for the slaughter, and which they could
easily break out of, if only they weren't, uh, cowed.# # # |
|
