I.
Just
a few months ago, it was thought that George W. Bush would have no problem
carrying Florida in the presidential race. After all, George's brother
Jeb is the governor of Florida which has a large Latino population and
Jeb is married to a Latina and has kids with her that former President
Bush had once correctly identified as "those little brown ones over there."
Few seemed to understand, however, that the Latinos in Florida were not
mestizo Mexican Latinos like Jeb's wife; they were Cubans, and many of
them were in some way connected with the former elites in Cuba who, as
is also the case with most of the present elites in Cuba, are more white
than brown.
Still, any Latino was better than no Latino and even while within the
"Latino community" there is less unity among the very different peoples
who are lumped, in this country, under the general rubric "Latino" than
is believe in the non-Latino community, it was apparently thought that
the Cubans would bond with the little brown Bushes and, by association,
their uncle the white Bush presidential candidate.
So,
George W. was expected to have it easy, as his campaign started troting
out one of the little brown ones, George W's nephew George P, who had
the Bush name but who looks nothing like the rest of the white Bushes.
The brown Bush, George P., then appeared before various Latino rallies
around the country and spoke in Spanish of helping his race (the brown
race).
Because he was brown, George P. wasn't called a racist and the press hardly
reported on what they would have called racist had a white said something
similar about whites.
The Bush people apparently believed that Latinos were eating it up up
around the country and seemed likely to vote for the white Bush because
he had a nephew who was a brown Bush. Of course, the Latinos who were
eating this up, weren't so much the Cubans of Florida, but were Mexicans
in other states.
Of course the aracial white drones didn't see the distinction. Latinos
were Latinos, to them. Have one of "their own" brown George P. endorse
white uncle George W. and all Latinos would be a lock in this view.
Of
course this was a mistake but it might have worked if all Latinos, finding
themselves in a mostly English speaking nation, did see themselves as
all one people just for that one vote. Then, out of the blue, Al Gore
named Joe Lieberman, a Jew, as his running mate.
Well, as you may be aware, Florida has a very large population of mostly
elderly Jews who have fled the harsh New York area winters and settled
in Florida. Suddenly, the poll numbers started shifting as the Jews started
appearing on the poll takers' radar screens with their expressed desire
to vote for Lieberman and his Shabbas Goy (a non-Jew who works for a Jew
on the Sabbath and Jewish holidays) whatshis face, Al Gore.
It's Lieberman they want. Gore is just the white guy in the window for
them. So the question is, will the Jew trump the little brown ones in
Florida? We'll come back to this in a minute.
Of
course we should briefly mention the seemingly strange case of Pat Buchanan
who named a black woman as his running mate. However, this is a little
different than the little brown ones and the Jew, because it's not that
Buchanan picked black Ezola Foster because he thought he'd get the black
vote so much as he needed cover from all the usual hate filled charges
aimed his way claiming that he is a racist and a xenophobe and anything
else the serial name callers can come up with.
Furthermore, Foster is not a Jesse Jackson liberal black who would attract
black voters. In fact, Foster's appeal is mostly to whites who are opposed
to illegal immigration, mostly from Mexico, and who constantly seek their
own cover lest they too be called racists.
Foster has been a long time very vocal opponent to illegal immigration
in the Los Angeles area. At any rate, Buchanan is not really the issue
here because he isn't so much running for president as much as he's running
to help build the third party movement.
Many people who might otherwise be turned off by Buchanan's selection
of Foster take the long view of history and still support Buchanan for
this attempt to create a real alternative to the other two parties.
It's probably worth noting in passing that Buchanan is Catholic, and while
there are millions of Catholics in this country there is not a very strong
Catholic identity among them that would cause them to bloc vote for Buchanan,
because he's Catholic. Also, while most Latinos are also Catholic their
religion is trumped by their ethnicity and Buchanan doesn't share that
with them.
II
What may be more important in the race between the little brown ones and
the Jew is that it points out, to those with the consciousness to see
this, that while whites are still the majority of people in this country
they are largely disregarded AS whites even by other whites. They are,
we might say, seen as some sort of blobs of not fully formed protoplasmic
putty on the American scene.
The subconscious thought is that whites are not a people, because they
don't see themselves as a people, and thus do not assert their peoplehood.
And, not being a people as a whole, few whites are authentic as individual
people.
Why is this so? Because whites have been so thoroughly brainwashed, reeducated,
conditioned and manipulated and have had their subconscious minds so planted
with what amounts to almost post-hypnotic suggestions that they are mostly
incapable of seeing themselves as a distinct ethnic group or as a distinct
people. They have become raceless neutral drones who run in fear lest
they be characterized as "racists."
And what does "racist" mean? In many contexts the term is thrown at whites
whenever they do start thinking that they are a distinct people. Whites
are fragmented and have almost no unity based on their genes as do all
other groups in America.
They are full of self-hate and group loathing. As I have written in other
columns, many whites are about where the American Indians were in the
not too distant past.
They just don't like themselves or their culture and are full of malaise.
They live but are not truly alive, because they are afraid of everything
and everyone.
They
are like mewling little mice. Anytime any of them pop up to try to assert
their people hood, they are smashed down by the evil orthodoxy of this
age that has broken their individual and collective will to be.
So, if you're a white politician such as Al Gore or George W. Bush you're
also a victim of the brainwashing of the past 40 or so years and you're
full of self-hate and group loathing, but in addition, even if your intellect
overcomes some of this self-hate and group loathing, you figure you can't
gain much by appealing to your fellow fragmented whites, whose own brainwashing
will keep them from finding unity based on their genes as the primary
identifier in their lives.
Indeed, many whites are quicker to find their identity--their inner meaning--in
identifying with a sports team or with their jobs. Ask these drones who
and what they are, and they'll rattle off a list of superficial things
and may never get to the fact that they're white.
It's not usually this way with Jews and non-whites who will have their
Jewishness or ethnic identity right near the top of their lists. Although
most people of all races and ethnicities in this nation will say that
they won't vote for a candidate based on race, religion or ethnicity,
the numbers tell a different tale and politicians know that if they say
the right things and appeal to the right groups (but, not whites) that
they can get an ethnic bloc vote.
And it's much better to get a bloc vote than to have to try to win over
each individual--as is the case with fragmented whites. To put this more
simply and in slightly different terms, aracial whites won't vote for
a candidate because he is white or because he will help white interests
because the aracial whites don't see themselves as being white or having
white interests.
III
Of course there are other reasons for the lack of unity among whites and
their present inability to see themselves as part of a group of like individuals
of the same genetic complement. Among such other reasons, and we find
this among certain libertarians and conservatives, is an internalized
myth that it is the individual who is the end all and be all of existence.
This internalized myth popularized by Ayn Rand (born Alice Rosenbaum)
holds that each individual is something of an island unto himself, and
that each individual must look out only for his own interests. To hell
with everyone else.
This myth plays right into and gives an intellectual underpinning to the
rugged individualist myth that has been part of America since its founding.
Those caught up in this myth are likely to display posters of bald eagles
with some variation of the slogan "You can't catch a flock of Eagles,
they fly alone."
Of course, the reality of our world is that the lone flying Eagle is almost
extinct. Of course, the extreme opposite view of this individualist view
is that we are supposed to help everyone else and not see others as being
different than ourselves.
Both extreme views help keep people from finding their genuine authentic
identities. This is so, because those holding the extreme individual is
everything view, fail to see themselves as part of a group of like individuals.
Everyone is just an individual who has almost magically sprung up here
on Earth and is fungible with all other individuals. Genes don't matter
because every person can be whatever he wants to be if he only works hard
enough. In this view, no one is part of any group.
Those holding the other extreme view that all people are the same also
fail to find their genuine authentic identity because they fail to see
themselves as part of a distinct group different from other groups. Both
extreme views lead to individual and group alienation from all that is
genuine and authentic and prevent people--primarily white people--from
knowing who and what they are.
IV
For a lesson on the reality of ethnic politics, watch the numbers out
of Florida broken down by race, religion and ethnicity. You'll no doubt
see that Lieberman and whathisface Goy Gore will get a majority of the
Jewish vote, while the "Latinos" will show somewhat less cohesiveness
as a group and split their vote.
This means that the Jew will trump the little brown ones. And, what about
the raceless white drones? They won't bloc vote at all, because, as discussed
above, they don't even know they're white.
And, of course, the PC types, the white-haters and the raceless white
drones will deny all of this and say that religion, race and ethnicity
don't matter and that to even point this out is "racist." Ho hum. But,
of course, religion, race and ethnicity don't matter only to raceless
white drones.
All the rest are voting for their own. The raceless white drones, however,
don't even know they have "their own." Now, if Jeb had married a Cuban
instead of a Mexican, then George W. might do better in Florida.
As it is, however, it appears that Jewish Joe Lieberman will trump the
little brown ones of Bush since Jewish identity may be stronger than Latino
identity, and there'll be a Jewish bloc vote for Lieberman and his running
mate, whatshisface, while the Latino vote will be fragmented.
# # # |