|
|
|
Let's be very clear on something. Massive Third World immigration to the U.S. is an act of genocide. It is wiping out European-Americans right before our eyes. European-Americans are being assimilated and absorbed into a gene pool that is not European-American. Their genes are under daily attack by a much superior force of genes. How could this be otherwise when white people are only ten percent of all humans on Earth? One thing, among many things, that is helping facilitate this immigration genocide is the U.S. two party system. |
|
Of course, the two parties are just fishing where most of the fish are located, and that makes sense from the standpoint of the parties, whose job and reason for existence is no longer to promote things to improve the nation, but to win elections. To do otherwise, under our present two party system, would be to constantly lose elections. Even though this pandering to the MAM and EGs may be understandable, it is no less destructive to the United States just because we understand it.. |
|
|
The
reason that this pandering to the MAM and EGs has become destructive
at this time in our history as a nation is because this nation has now
become full of non-European foreigners who aren't just "plain"
Americans, and who don't want to be, as was the case with the Europeans
who came here. Instead, these non-Europeans are setting up colonies
in this land to preserve their genetic, cultural and religious differences.
They see themselves as different from European-Americans and often see
European-Americans as standing in their way to transforming the U.S.
into a brown nation.
|
Now, we must add that the two party system does give stability the two political parties--but it also can, as it is doing now, cause instability and danger for the nation in the long term, and it can also keep those citizens who aren't apathetic MAMs, and who do see problems in the nation, from having any real voice. Add to this dynamic the reality that, in the world today, genocide has snuck into the popular culture disguised as anti-racism and with an agenda of blending now distinct races into a Tan Everyman. Many MAMs don't see through the disguise to the evil because of the masking with nice sounding phrases. Because this disguised genocide has spread so far and wide in the culture, the two political parties do everything in their power to avoid taking positions that could be demonized by the other party as racist. So, even if the two parties didn't directly pander to foreigners, they might still push various open border policies to avoid being called racists or any of this term's progeny, such as "xenophobes," "bigots," "prejudiced," "white supremacists." This two party system is not good for America in a multi-cultural U.S. And, it is not good for the continuation of distinct races of man in America. But, how do you fight it when most people are blinded to the reality? The partial answer is that good, decent people should speak out against the genocide of massive Third World immigration to the U.S. at every opportunity, and maybe some others will understand. |
|
|
However,
it will take much more to change people's views in what I've called
post-American America--a world gone mad. One of the things that needs
to be done in the U.S. is to form a political party that tells the truth,
and which does it in a way that redounds with people today. This is
being done in many European nations and more and more people are seeing
the light, and moving toward these immigration reform and anti-genocide
parties that are pushing to close their borders to the Third World.
Europe
is able to do this faster than in the U.S. precisely because of the
European parliamentary system, which unlike the American political system,
allows major changes to be made in governments relatively quickly because
small parties aren't frozen out and can gain influence. These small
parties often start out with a handful of people who believe in the
message of the party. Sometimes, the message makes sense to many more
people and they also join or at least vote for the party's candidates.
Because of the possibility of having many small parties, these small
parties are not inclined to think of things as a duality but as shades
of gray, and the parties often come into being, not to pander to MAMs
but to various groups based on their ideological, social, and political
interests. These parties, at their best, have rock solid platforms,
that do not change 180 degrees in order to keep the party in power,
as is done in the U.S. If the parties can't attract people to their
platforms--their world views--then the parties usually fail and fade
away. If they can attract people to their platforms, then the parties
grow and come into power. Contrast that to the Republican and Democrat
parties, which, as already discussed, have become very like one another
because they're both after the same voters--the MAMs and the bloc voting
EGs.|
Since we don't have such a system in this country where small parties can come out of nowhere overnight, and since we're not likely to get one--after all, the Republicans and Democrats like their monopoly--those who want to see real political change to retake this nation for American citizens need to get realistic and start bringing forth alternative parties. You may say, and rightly so, that alternative parties have come forward many times in America, but nothing happens to change the two party system. I would answer that the reason nothing happens is because the parties that have tried this, have almost always focused their attention on the presidency.  What
needs to happen to break the monopoly is for a national leader to step
forward who will focus on party building and who will focus on local elections,
right down to the town and county level, then to the state level and on
up. Such foundation building is difficult and takes a lot of energy and
it requires a national leader to come forth and subjugate his ego to help
at the local level while maintaining a high national profile so that the
building can take place in the wake that he makes nationally. |
|
Such a party based on immigration reform and law and order can be built, in my view, if a national leader with enough charisma and with enough desire comes forth who can seemingly look beyond what we normally think of as left and right, and who will do the nitty gritty work that is needed.
If such a party is formed, given the realities of our present two party system, its likelihood of success is slim. Still, if we only do those things in life that are guaranteed to succeed, we'll do damn little in life. |
Will
this happen? I don't know. I do know, however, that Pat Buchanan has
been talking about an immigration reform party in general terms. If
Mr. Buchanan does get involved in such a thing, it remains to be seen
whether he will be able to overcome what may be his natural inclination
to be the total focus of the party and, instead, use his stature to
try to bubble up some grass roots folks who are intelligent and who
are not as cranky and likely to pick up their toys and go home as was
the case in some of his past efforts.|
# # # |
|
|
|