MY THOUGHTS ON KEVIN MACDONALD'S EXCELLENT ESSAY ABOUT RACIOLOGY*
This is not a review of Professor MacDonald's excellent essay about Raciology and I do not mean to put words in his mouth. I am simply using MacDonald's essay as a jumping off point, and I am doing so precisely because his essay is so good that I hope some who read what I've written below will then, if they haven't already, read MacDonald's essay to get to the real meat of some of the deeper reasons for the problems we Whites face in our traditional nations that now look like the Star Wars Bar. MacDonald's essay is so good, that it really can stand completely on its alone apart from the book for which it is the foreword.
And, with this universalistic outlook from our past still part of our beings, Whites today fail to see that Whites helping other Whites--and seeing ourselves and other Whites as part of an in-group--a particularistic outlook--would tend to also help individual Whites as well.
Now, back to the Jews. My observations of Jewish behavior indicates that they generally lack a strong sense of oneness with other individual Jews, and, in fact, are often contemptuous of other Jews and very competitive with them, but they generally have a strong esprit de corps for Jewishness, per se. It is as though they are all players on a sports team, and while they squabble and compete within the locker room, they all have a strong allegiance to the team as a whole. With Whites, on the other hand, we see the same attitudes towards other individual Whites as we see from Jews towards other individual Jews, but with Whites, we lack that sense of a team allegiance, so Whites will not only be contemptuous of other Whites as individuals but we'll also be contemptuous of us even comprising a team at all. The result of this for Whites is that it puts every White out on his own with no protections from the White group as a whole. This worked once, when our lands were mainly White, but it now puts us at a disadvantage as we can be picked off one by one by those who hate us and who are on the other teams and who act for the benefit of their particular teams.
by H. Millard
It was recently announced that State Senator Marty Block, (D-San Diego), started the Legislative Jewish Caucus and that this caucus will also form a political action committee to raise money for Israel-friendly candidates. Block told the press that the Legislative Jewish Caucus "isn't a religious based organization. We see this as an ethnic organization." This statement was presumably made to both forestall Muslims from starting a Muslim Legislative Caucus and also to head off complaints that the Legislative Jewish Caucus is breaching the wall between religion and state.
At any rate, the Legislative Jewish Caucus, as an ethnic/racial organization, now joins the Asian Pacific Islander Caucus, the Legislative Black Caucus and the Latino Legislative Caucus.
These caucuses work, sometimes behind the scenes and out of public view, to represent the interests of their ethnic/racial groups. They write legislation and take other actions on behalf of their particular ethnic/racial groups even though the people they are acting on behalf of may not live in their districts. In other words, unlike the traditional American political notion that people elected to public office represent a specific geographic area, these ethnic caucus members represent "their people," no matter where they live in the state.
An example of what the members of these ethnic/racial caucuses do was presented in the Daily Pilot recently in a story about State Assemblyman Roger Hernandez, a member of the Latino Legislative Caucus, who has authored a bill that would force cities such as Costa Mesa to end city wide voting and replace it with district voting. District voting is a scheme that will lead to gerrymandered districts in Costa Mesa, in an attempt to include Latino voters in certain districts and exclude White voters from the districts.
On the welcome page of the Asian Pacific Islander Caucus we read this: "[T]he Caucus was founded in 2001 and serves to represent and advocate for the interests of the APIA community...."
On the Website of the Latino Legislative Caucus we read: "The Mission of the California Latino Legislative Caucus is to identify, promote and advocate on behalf of the professional, educational, social, political and cultural interests of the Latino Community."
And, on the Website of the Legislative Black Caucus we read: "The continuing mission of the CLBC is to provide our unwavering commitment and support to our goal of achieving full inclusion of our state’s Africans American residents in every aspect of California life – from education and employment to housing and health to commerce and government services."
So, there you have it. Four ethnic/racial organizations all advocating for the interests of their people. Who advocates for White people? No one.
Now, some who haven't kept up with the news may say that a White Legislative Caucus isn't needed because Whites are in the majority in the state. Actually, we're not. Latinos have ether reached numbers parity or have exceeded the size of the White population. Some others may argue that Whites are not an ethnicity, but a race, and that we shouldn't lump the various White ethnicities (or people who originated in many different European nations) together under one rubric such as White. Well, the Asian Pacific Islander Caucus lumps various Asian and Pacific Islander populations together, and the Legislative Black Caucus is based on race.
I'll ask and answer this question once again: Who represents Whites and White interests? No one.
It's time to change that. Will we now see some White legislators start a White Legislative Caucus? Probably not. Why? Because Whites have been so brow beaten about race that it seems many are even afraid to order a gallon of white paint at the hardware store lest they be called racist. The result of this racial intimidation that Whites have undergone for years is that Whites are left without any real representation for their particular interests (and we have many) in the state legislature.
Those timid souls who are so brow beaten that they run from the word "white," can simply use the term European-American if it makes them feel more comfortable.
# # #
THREE BOOKS BY HARD TO PIGEONHOLE H. MILLARD
All three books are now listed on Amazon.com.
The lefties at the OC WEEKLY said Millard is one of OC's most frightening people.
"Millard is an important writer" New Nation News
"I consider H. Millard one of the most brilliant writers and analysts
Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion
ROAMING THE WASTELANDS
THE OUTSIDER - (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9)
|Views expressed by guest columnists, reporters and external links not necessarily those of the editor of New Nation News but hopefully of some interest|